Issues That Prove Challenging In A Medical Malpractice Case

A patient that has been displeased by a given physician’s attitude does not have grounds for a medical malpractice case. Certain elements must be present, before any former patient can file such a case.

Necessary elements

• The existence of a doctor-patient relationship
• Proof that the offered care was of a substandard quality
• The need for both of those elements has made it almost impossible to have a medical malpractice case against a nursing home.

Possible targets for any of the medical malpractice cases

• A physician
• A health care professional working in an ER room
• A health care professional working in hospital’s ICU
• Someone operating a piece of diagnostic equipment
• Someone administering a treatment to a patient
• Someone that has been charged with evaluating tests in a laboratory
• An anesthesiologist
• A dentist
• A pharmacist
• An optometrist
• Someone charged with providing physical therapy

When legal help sought, paying a lawyer can seem challenging

Most Personal Injury Lawyers in Mississauga charge on a contingency fee basis. In other words, the hired attorney gets an agreed-upon percent of whatever award the plaintiff receives. Plaintiffs must also pay the expenses created by the lawyer’s quest for information.

Guidance for approaching just about any issue

First, establish an applicable standard of care for the situation-in-question. Study how, and to what extent the defendant deviated from that standard of care. It might be necessary to consult experts in the field. Identify the ways that the deviations taken by the defendant harmed you/the plaintiff.

Understand how a jury is supposed to judge the evidence submitted by any plaintiff that is charging negligence by someone in the health care field. The jury is supposed to decide whether or not a preponderance of the evidence supports the plaintiff’s allegations.

That means that the jury must determine whether or not the plaintiff’s allegations are more probable than not. Hence, without first hand testimony against the defendant, it becomes difficult to show that the allegation of negligence by the defendant was more probable than not.

Could not the staff in a hospital become a source of witnesses?

No, hospitals do not like to suggest that any member of their staff has been guilty of negligence. That tarnishes the hospital’s reputation. When a hospital’s reputation has been tarnished, then the career history for each member of its staff has been made less appealing to a future employer.

There is no praise for anyone that goes tattling on other doctors. He or she could struggle to advance further in the medical field. He or she might even develop the sort of attitude that could trigger performance of negligent actions. Hence, some doctors start to act in a manner that differs from the letter of the law.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *