Sometimes a drowsy driver dozes off and loses control of the steering wheel. According to traffic statistics, hundreds of thousands of accidents were caused by drowsy driving.
Who could be held liable if a motorist has dozed off and has helped to cause a crash?
Obviously, the fatigued driver could be held liable. In some cases, the head of a trucking company might bear part of the responsibility for the crash. The head of such a company might push truck drivers to stay on the road for an unsafe amount of time.
Should the other driver have been more alert? Maybe the other driver could have avoided a crash, if he or she had not chosen to use a cell phone at that particular time of the day.
The claimant must prove all 4 of the essential elements of negligence.
• Proof of the defendant’s duty of core towards other drivers
• Proof that the defendant violated that same duty
• Evidence of the fact that the defendant’s violation caused the plaintiff to suffer an injury
• Evidence of the fact that the plaintiff suffered measurable losses
What sources of evidences could be used to prove each of the 4 essential elements of negligence?
The published traffic laws should testify to the fact that each driver has a duty of care towards all the other motorists. There would be nothing in those published laws to suggest that the plaintiff deserved less care and consideration than all the other motorists.
There are at least 5 possible sources for facts that should prove element number 2 (The defendant breached his or her duty.)
—No skid marks
—Testimony from an expert at reconstruction of an accident
—Sometimes, too, a social media post, one written by the fatigued driver, manages to reveal the extent of the post writer’s contribution to an accident at a given location.
The plaintiff’s medical record should reveal any facts that could verify the allegation that the defendant’s actions had caused the plaintiff’s injury.
The plaintiff’s medical bills and repair bills should show the extent of the victim’s financial losses.
Possible defenses, if an insured driver has been charged with drowsy driving.
Any evidentiary material that could highlight a violation by the plaintiff: For instance, it could be that he or she was not paying attention to the road during the minutes before the collision.
Personal Injury Lawyer in Mississauga knows that a witness statement that reported the plaintiff’s failure to take any action, in order to avoid a collision, when the defendant’s vehicle started to drift into a different lane. A claim that the plaintiff’s lawsuit had been submitted to the court after the deadline, as stated in the statute of limitations.