Obviously, a store or business shows an interest in each customer. That particular establishment hopes to profit from some of the customer’s money. Yet the law states that the same establishment should demonstrate readiness to care for each of its customers. If lack of care leads to occurrence of a slip and fall incident, the injured victim has a right to file a personal injury lawsuit, with the help of Personal Injury Lawyer in Burlington.
Questions asked by court if a store or business becomes the target of such a lawsuit
Was someone working at that same store or business negligent? Did someone in that particular location carry out a careless and neglectful action?
Did that negligence cause the injury-creating accident? No one can be held responsible for injuries suffered by the fallen victim, if it cannot be proven that the victim’s body got injured at the time of the fall.
What members of jury seek to determine, while searching for answers to the two questions posted above
The victim got hurt while on the premises of commercial establishment. Did unsafe conditions exist in the building that housed such an enterprise? Was the property owner aware of that particular condition? Does reason indicate that the property owner should have been aware of those unsafe conditions?
Among the facts shared by witnesses, there might be one or two that suggested that some structural issue had contributed to creation of the unsafe conditions, the ones that caused one person to slip and fall. If that were the case, then the jury would need to hear the answers to a few other questions.
Inquiries that might be made, in hopes of learning more about the origin of the structural issues
How long had those dangerous structural issues been in existence? Can the property owner show proof that time and effort had been devoted to arranging for maintenance of the area in which the slip and fall incident occurred?
If the structure in which the customer visiting a store or business seemed without any issue that would increase the chances for a slip and fall incident, then the information sought from witnesses would focus on the store or business owner. Had that owner introduced some change that could have heightened the chances that someone might end up slipping and falling?
Eventually, the jury would have to decide whether the landlord or the owner of the store or business should be sued. The case could end with the jury declaring that the neither the owner nor the landlord should be held responsible for the unfortunate mishap. Alternately, the jury could rule that one or both of those parties had aided creation of conditions that increased the chances for a falling incident.
